🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.