🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.