🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president asserting the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states used their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations resume.

The US president recently said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his address to the forum, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the final solution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the state in the aftermath of this assault."