🔗 Share this article

While the struggling Tories meets in Manchester for its annual party conference, it has plenty to consider regarding its next steps. Doubt remains if a viable path is available. We are in challenging circumstances for a governing group that now has very little, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to voters.

What Could Have Been

Things could have turned out so different if real advances had been made on an priority that resonates with people nationwide: Levelling up. Yet the previous administration hadn’t got the slightest idea on how to turn his zeitgeisty rhetoric on levelling up into actual implementation. During the initial period after the 2019 election, it argued over what the phrase truly represented.

I found it bizarre, because I’d already told the Prime Minister what social mobility entailed when we initially discussed about it during the contest for party leader. The phrase was a concept I originated and used at the DfE to talk about equal opportunity. It served as our core mission, and its purpose is straightforward: levelling up is the approach by which we achieve equality of opportunity – not through reducing chances away from those who possess it, but rather by providing options to those that don’t.

Essential Principle

Another crucial DfE phrase we used, “potential is equally shared across our country, yet chances are not”, represented another a deliberate expression, embodying the dual components of a social mobility strategy. To begin with, talent spread evenly but not developed consistently through our education system. Furthermore, chances not distributed fairly by employers or our economy. Therefore, schools and companies were key to achieving better life chances. This represented an mission about the community framework of our country – supporting human talent and connecting them to chances.

What Levelling Up Became

How did levelling up evolve into under the Tory administration? Regional development money overseen from the the relevant ministry. Hanging baskets and redeveloped traffic systems. A white paper was launched nearly three years after the leadership change, which saw current strategies relabelled under the recently branded agenda.

As a result, a broader social mobility agenda went unpursued, as well as all the reform that it could have inspired – in capital, business, financial planning, taxation and in place-making. And, of course, in learning, including a university system that has become a target for elected officials – although it remains the strongest driver of upward movement for young working-class people, personally, this country has had in recent decades. Maybe the sole mechanism of fair chances, functioning widely.

The Role of Ambition

Hope is crucial for our country to prosper. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a realistic expectation that effort and reward are connected; that if people aim high, they can achieve. For all administrations, being able to foster a feeling of hope about the years ahead is crucial. Studies by the Institute for Policy Research at the university and others, recently released, showed that the education department’s targeted regions I established during my tenure – community-focused methods to improving education outcomes – led to young people in those communities being up to nearly one-fifth more hopeful about their prospects than those in comparable communities without these initiatives in place. The evidence is clear: just making an genuine beginning on pro-social mobility policy can quickly and positively change how people feel about their prospects.

Lost Potential

Ignoring this evidence, and in the throes of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in September 2022, the Tory administration closed opportunity areas down. What reason would someone in those regions vote for a organization that made that decision? The targeted programme is a single instance of what had the potential to be a game-changing Conservative government agenda on social mobility, but that chance was completely wasted. Approaches such as this can create belief and drive. Conversely, as the Tories found out, breaking the promise of social mobility is the biggest blunder any political party can make. The public punished the leadership for its ineffectiveness but, above all, for its broken promises on levelling up.

Present Circumstances

At present the responsibility on life chances and equality of opportunity has been transferred to a opposition party. The previous terminology has been abandoned. The current administration has its own policy language of “breaking down the barriers to opportunity”. The party that is steadily supplanting the struggling incumbents, the alternative party, also has its own language – “economic renewal”. This expression to talk about additional chances in regions like the one I was raised in, in the region. It suggests that an former economic strength can revive into an modern manufacturing sector.

For voters, it must seem like a repetitive cycle. Same issue, new terminology. However, so far, no progress.

The Way Forward

Whether the government and opposition want to prevent the similar destiny, the respective organizations should take lessons from the previous government’s errors on levelling up; that equal opportunity talk is one thing, but successful delivery of fairer outcomes is significantly more difficult. The UK’s endemically weak social mobility remains the key issue for our country, with young people unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in employment with little to show after the rent has been paid, and individuals nationwide without any actual expectation their next generation will be able to do any better in life than they have.

Leaders can mention improved access repeatedly. Yet where is the political group that has the complete plan on life chances? I see none. Whichever party succeeds initially, succeeds. Not just for themselves, but, more importantly, for a entire nation that has desperately requires fair chances so badly.