🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.